· 3/16/1925
Wilson v. W. R. Grace & Co.
Citations
- 4 F.2d 673
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3067
- 1925 A.M.C. 664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in a rule challenge under ORS 183.400, “[t]he efficacy of the rules is not subject to review by this court”
- in a rule challenge under ORS 183.400, “[t]he efficacy of the rules is not subject to review by this court”
- “To begin exempting the specific business at which the challenged rules are directly aimed and which they are intended to regulate would be inconsistent with the purpose of the rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cireuit, Gilbert, Hunt, Morrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.