Wilson v. Tobiassen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an incapacity to consent provided by the state’s criminal statute also applies in civil cases
• holding that an incapacity to consent provided by the state's criminal statute also applies in civil cases
• stating that “a person under eigh- teen is incapable of consenting to a sexual act”
• stating that “a person under eighteen is incapable of consenting to a sexual act”
• explaining that the physical injury rule provides assurance that the men- tal disturbance is genuine and permits the courts to dis- tinguish legitimate claims from speculative ones
• consent no defense in civil action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Golden Spread Council, Inc. 562 of the Boy Scouts of America v. Akins
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 220×
• Christensen v. Royal School Dist. No. 160
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-12-08· cited 69×
• Bjerke v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-27· cited 65×
• Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-12-08· cited 63×
• Philibert v. Kluser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 60×
• C.C.H. v. Philadelphia Phillies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-02-19· cited 35×
• Chouinard v. Health Ventures
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-13· cited 30×
• Bjerke v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-02-13· cited 19×
• Carlos Rene Rivas-Gomez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-04-03· cited 15×
• Mississippi State Federation of Colored Women's Club Housing for the Elderly in Clinton, Inc. v. in the Interest of L.R.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2010-12-16· cited 11×
• Boger v. Norris & Stevens, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-02· cited 10×
• Rustvold v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22· cited 10×
• Jane Doe 130 v. Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon
  D. Oregon· 2010-05-04· cited 9×
• Shoemaker v. Management Recruiters International, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-29· cited 6×
• Colon v. Jarvis
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-03-25· cited 6×
• Brown v. Youth Services International of South Dakota, Inc.
  D. South Dakota· 2000-03-15· cited 4×
• In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.
  D. Oregon· 2006-03-09· cited 3×
• Hofer v. OHSU
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-18· cited 3×
• Rivas-Gomez v. Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-04-03
• Rogue Federal Credit Union v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-14

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-11-15· cited 179×
• Noe v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-13· cited 101×
• Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 32×
• Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 31×
• Saechao v. Matsakoun
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-07-01· cited 31×
• Saechao v. Matsakoun
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-10-28· cited 20×
• DeMaris v. Whittier
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-10-04· cited 18×
• City of Ashland v. Hoffarth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-03-11· cited 15×
• Harris v. Kissling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-18· cited 14×
• Hough v. Iderhoff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-03-24· cited 13×
• Dunn v. Gracia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-08· cited 4×