Wilson v. Shumate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that pay differential was justified by prior pay and superior experience of male employee and granting summary judgment
• concluding that pay differential was justified by prior pay and superior experience of male employee and granting summary judgment
• suggesting a decline in revenue could be a factor other than sex justifying paying an employee less than her predecessor
• no EPA violation where experienced police officer brought in as permanent chief of police to replace female temporary chief due to male officer’s extensive experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).