District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/31/2003
Wilson v. Salamon
Citations
- 864 So. 2d 1122
- 2003 WL 23094615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the fifty years since Gulf Appliance was decided, the courts have never managed to establish a workable, predictable definition that distinguishes ‘passive’ activity from ‘active’ activity.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- F.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 200×
- Puryear v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-02-07· cited 124×
- Gulf Appliance Distributors v. LongSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-07-27· cited 64×
- Eastern Elevator, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-05-10· cited 49×
- Del Duca v. AnthonySupreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-24· cited 49×
- Metropolitan Dade County v. HallSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-26· cited 40×
- NEI v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 17×
- Buss Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Crown Window CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-06· cited 5×
- Abaddon, Inc. v. SchindlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-21· cited 4×
- McClung v. McClungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.