Wilson v. Rutherford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing whether an assistant Commonwealth’s attorney violated the rules of professional conduct by signing a brief that quoted an indictment charging a defendant with the wrong offense
• discussing whether an assistant Commonwealth’s attorney violated the rules of professional conduct by signing a brief that quoted an indictment charging a defendant with the wrong offense
• applying Code § 8.01-271.1 in discussing whether an assistant Commonwealth’s attorney violated the rules of professional conduct by signing a brief that quoted an indictment charging a defendant with the wrong offense
• applying Code § 8.01-271.1 in discussing whether an assistant Commonwealth’s attorney violated the rules of professional conduct by signing a brief that quoted an indictment charging a defendant with the wrong offense
• evidence that the defendant entered a school by smashing a window, that defendant was not an employee or parent of a student at the school, and that the defendant fled was 9 sufficient to show defendant’s lack of authority to enter the school

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).