Wilson v. Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find that the speed bump in question does not substantially interfere with [the] reasonable use and enjoyment of [the] easement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• B.J. 96 Corp. v. Mester
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-06-10· cited 245×
• Dianne v. Wingate
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-02· cited 14×
• Chekijian v. Mans
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-11-16· cited 13×
• Gisondi v. Nyack Mews Condominium
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-06-08· cited 7×
• LeBaron v. DPL & B, LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-12-05· cited 4×
• Lucas v. Kandis
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-03-24· cited 3×
• Marek v. Woodcock
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-11-28· cited 1×
• Berg v. Cahill
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-02-08· cited 1×
• Utrecht v. 142 East 49th Street Owners Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-05-11
• Edwards-Pitt v. Doe
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-12-02
• Anthony J. Giger v. Joshua L. Hogue
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-10-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brigss v. Di Donna
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-10-24· cited 22×
• Oliphant v. McCarthy
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-10-20· cited 13×
• Wechsler v. People
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-02-02· cited 11×