Skip to main content

Wilson v. Nelson

Citations

  • 437 Pa. 254
  • 258 A.2d 657
  • 1969 Pa. LEXIS 620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[j]urors should render their verdict on the basis of -4- J-A23032-19 deductions from the evidence presented and not on the basis of some calculation, independently proposed and arrived at by trial counsel.”
  • stating that trial court did not err in requiring, during closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel to remove a chart depicting dollar figures for various damages, because the proposed figure for loss of future wages was unsupported by evidence
  • considering loss of future damages in calculating a damages award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.