Wilson v. McCullough Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that [an invention] is ‘remote’ is of no added consequence to the abstract nature of the concept.”
• “The fact that the pharmacist is ‘remote’ is of no added consequence to the abstract nature of the concept.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).