Wilson v. Lowe's Home Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff’s “IIED claim against [his employer] was subsumed by his KRS Chapter 344 claims”
• holding that a jury could find IIED when the plaintiff “was subjected to racial remarks on nearly a daily basis by his coworkers and supervisors for a period of approximately seven years”
• holding that KCRA preempts outrage claim against employer, but not individuals; “the fact that a civil rights claim may be filed against an employer does not prohibit the filing of an [outrage] claim against the offending individuals against whom no civil rights claim could have been filed”
• reversing summary judgment where employee “was subjected to racial remarks on nearly a daily basis by his coworkers and supervisors for a period of approximately seven years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).