Skip to main content
· 10/8/1917

Wilson v. Locomobile Co.

Citations

  • 68 Pa. Super. 492
  • 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 154

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Guaranty—Oral evidence — Case for jury.</p> <p>Where a -written contract for the sale of an automobile fixed the price, stated a number of details as to equipment, and concluded as follows, “this car is to bo put in guaranteed condition,” oral evidence is admissible to explain what “guaranteed condition” meant, and especially evidence as to representations made by the seller’s agent, at the time of the sale tending to show what the words meant.</p> <p>Practice, O. P. — Trial—Points.</p> <p>Points for charge which are based on assertions that the undisputed evidence established certain facts are prbperly refused, where an examination of the evidence shows that such facts are not so established.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.