· 4/30/1906
Wilson v. John Gauche's Sons, Ltd.
Citations
- 3 Teiss. 340
- 1906 La. App. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a trial court must support its findings with reasons before imposing a sentence that departs from the minimum
- indicating that a record must reflect that the trial court considered all requisite factors before sentencing an offender
- stating that the findings and reasons may be reflected in the record from the sentencing hearing or the judgment entry and reversing because although there existed some reasons that may support a finding, the court made no findings
- remanding case for resentencing where the trial court imposed a sentence without specifying any of the requisite findings and reasons in the sentencing statute
- R.C. 2929.19 [B] [2] calls for court to provide an explanation to support its findings
- where the Ohio Supreme Court evaluated the validity of a maximum sentence based on the contents of both the transcript and the journal entry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.