Wilson v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding summary judgment for municipality where there was a noticeable gap between sidewalk pavers because this did not constitute a dangerous condition
• upholding summary judgment for municipality where there was a noticeable gap between sidewalk pavers because this did not constitute a dangerous condition
• house entirely rented to tenant was \commercial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-07-27· cited 53×
• Mohamed v. IGLESIA EVANGELICA
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-03-21· cited 33×
• Dupree v. City of Clifton
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-05-28· cited 17×
• Grijalba v. Floro
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-06-03· cited 11×
• Nielsen v. Lee
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-12-03· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-10-24· cited 3,095×
• Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-22· cited 168×
• Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-02-08· cited 95×
• Yanhko v. Fane
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-07-07· cited 72×
• Fluehr v. City of Cape May
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-05-26· cited 67×
• Brown v. St. Venantius School
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-08· cited 44×
• Hambright v. Yglesias
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-04-17· cited 33×
• Smith v. Young
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-04-23· cited 17×
• Borges v. Hamed
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-17· cited 16×
• Avallone v. Mortimer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-12-26· cited 16×
• Gilhooly v. Zeta Psi Fraternity
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-20· cited 9×