Wilson v. Fay

Citations

• 119 Wash. 88
• 204 P. 800
• 1922 Wash. LEXIS 724

Syllabus

<p>Vendor and Purchaser (64) — -Rescission by Purchaser — Estoppel. A contract for the purchase of a rooming house will not be rescinded because of the vendor’s failure to deliver a copy of the contract, where the purchaser remained in possession and made payments called for by the contract at a bank where the copy was kept.</p> <p>Same (63, 65) — Rescission by Purchaser — Defect in Title— Conditions Precedent. A contract for the purchase of a rooming house will not be rescinded without tender of performance by the purchaser, because of an alleged incumbrance or lien, contrary to the representations of the vendor, where the purchaser had not been disturbed in her possession.</p>