Skip to main content
· 10/13/2015

Wilson v. Fanning

Citations

  • 139 F. Supp. 3d 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a letter of reprimand did not substantially burden plaintiff’s exercise of religion because it “did not bar him from voicing his [religiously motivated] opposition to same-sex marriage in other fora or by other means”
  • explaining that judicial review of a claim under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act requires exhaustion of administrative remedies
  • upholding censure of enlisted National Guard member for emails regarding same-sex marriage
  • military personnel decisions, including discipline and discharge, are nonjusticiable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amit P. Mehta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.