Wilson v. Edwards
Citations
- 32 Pa. Super. 295
- 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3
Syllabus
<p>Sale — Fraudulent sale — Sale in bulk of stock of merchandise — Notice— Parties — Act of March 28, 1905, P. L. 62.</p> <p>Under the Act of March 28, 1905, P. L. 62, entitled “An Act relative to the sale in bulk of the whole, or a large part of a stock of merchandise and fixtures, not in the ordinary course of business; providing certain requirements therefor; imposing certain duties upon the seller, and making then violation a misdemeanor,” a creditor who has not received the notice of the sale provided by the act may proceed alone without the co-operation of other creditors to have the sale declared fraudulent and void, and this he may do by securing a judgment against the debtor, and issuing execution against the goods in the hands of the purchaser.</p> <p>The language of the Act of March 28, 1905, P. L. 62, that such sale without notice “ shall be deemed fraudulent and voidable as against the creditors of the seller,” is not to be construed as simply casting the burden of proving the good faith of the transaction on the purchaser, but is to be construed as meaning that noncompliance by the purchaser with the provisions of the act shall make the sale voidable as to creditors without regard to the intent of the parties to it.</p> <p>Constitutional law — Class legislation — Federal constitution — Fourteenth amendment — Act of March 28, 1905, P. L. Q2 — Sale in hulk of stock of merchandise.</p> <p>The'act of March 28, 1905, entitled “An Act relative to the sale in bulk of the whole, or a large part of a stock of merchandise and fixtures, or merchandise, or fixtures, not in the ordinary course of business; providing certain requirements therefor, imposing certain duties upon the seller, and making their violation a misdemeanor,” is not arbitrary class legislation which denies to those affected by it the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution.</p> <p>Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring
Judges: Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-12-20· cited 14×
- Northrop v. Finn Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-01-07· cited 13×
- Balter v. CrumMissouri Court of Appeals· 1918-05-07· cited 8×
- Schmucker v. LawlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-02-26· cited 7×
- Feingold v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-02-25· cited 4×
- McLean v. Miller Robinson Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1931-04-01· cited 1×
- Mervine v. Indian Queen Hotel Corp.Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1928-02-16· cited 1×
- Felix v. Urquhart Manufacturing Co.Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1923-12-10
- Gitt v. HokeYork County Court of Common Pleas· 1929-06-17
- Plumer v. FlynnPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1953-04-07
- Wolfe v. Millers Garage, Inc.Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1954-01-30
- Wolson v. WorrilowDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1928-10-05
- Miller v. T. I. C. Consumer Discount Co.Adams County Court of Common Pleas· 1949-07-29
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 1,266×
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court· 1897-01-18· cited 580×
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court· 1902-03-10· cited 575×
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1887-01-17· cited 460×
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1888-04-09· cited 387×
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court· 1880-04-12· cited 375×
- Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 273×
- Kentucky Railroad Tax CasesSupreme Court· 1885-11-16· cited 176×
- Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-01-03· cited 57×
- John P. Squire & Co. v. TellierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1904-01-07· cited 55×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. RibletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1870-10-18· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1830-01-28· cited 48×
- Minnesota Iron Co. v. KlineSupreme Court· 1905-12-18· cited 44×
- Booth v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1900-06-21· cited 36×
- Scowden's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1881-01-03· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1882-02-27· cited 27×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1881-01-03· cited 17×
- City of McKeesport v. McKeesport & Reynoldton Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-16· cited 14×
- Covanhovan v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1853-09-08· cited 13×
- Haskell v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1878-02-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.