Wilson v. Counts
Citations
- 52 S.C. 218
- 29 S.E. 649
- 1898 S.C. LEXIS 70
Syllabus
<p>1. Betterments. — Nonsuit properly refused, because there was some testimony tending to show that at the time improvements were made the owner thought he held a good title. Divided Court.</p> <p>2. Charge — Homestead—Betterments.—Under the facts in this case, the request to charge, “that if the improvements were made on lands that had been assigned to the defendant for a homestead, then neither the plaintiff nor those through whom he claims, would have the right to recover a judgment against such homestead for improvements made thereon,” was properly refused.</p> <p>Mr. Chief Justice McIver, dissenting.</p>
Judges: Gary, McIver, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.