Wilson v. Communications Workers of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the “amendment added a new substantive theory which is fundamentally distinct from the original race discrimination charge[,]” it “did not relate to, or grow out of the [plaintiffs] original EEOC charge”
• holding that because the “amendment added a new substantive theory which is fundamentally distinct from the original race discrimination charge,” it “did not relate to, or grow out of, [plaintiff’s] original EEOC charge”
• holding that because the “amendment added a new substantive theory which is fundamentally distinct from the original race discrimination charge,” it “did not relate to, or grow out of [the plaintiff’s] original EEOC charge”
• conclusory allegation that plaintiff was qualified for promotion does not create genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).