Skip to main content
· 1/26/2015

Wilson v. City of Dayton

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 1192
  • 191 L. Ed. 2d 131
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3625
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 763
  • 2015 WL 303226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the circuit court’s granting of summary judgment for the homeowner where the bank could not prove it was the holder of the note
  • “While a plaintiff in a foreclosure should also have assignment of 8 the mortgage, it is the note that is important because ‘[w]here a promissory note is secured by a mortgage, the mortgage is an incident to the note.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.