Wilson v. Cherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying prejudgment interest on a legal malpractice claim based on defendant’s failure to advise plaintiff of tax savings option
• denying prejudgment interest on a legal malpractice claim based on defendant's failure to advise plaintiff of tax savings option
• denying prejudgment interest on a legal malpractice claim based on defendant's failure to advise plaintiff of tax savings option
• “Illinois does not *** permit the award of prejudgment interest in suits for recovery for negligence”
• “[N]o case law has been called to our attention where prejudgment interest has been permitted merely because of ease of computation of the underlying damages.”
• “Illinois does not presently permit the award of prejudgment interest in suits for recovery for negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).