· 3/12/1921
Wilson v. Begshaw
Citations
- 108 Kan. 543
- 196 P. 605
- 1921 Kan. LEXIS 217
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Sale op Real Estate — Default in Payments — Forfeiture Would Be Inequitable. Under the facts and findings herein, as indicated in the opinion, the plaintiff is not entitled to a forfeiture of his contract for the sale of the real estate involved.</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.