Wilson v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial judge’s ex parte meeting with estate’s accountant constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Albert v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-09· cited 9×
• R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. SAUNDRA ALONSO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF FRANCIS ALONSO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06· cited 3×
• H.L.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-05· cited 2×
• Garner v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-05· cited 2×
• In re Guardianship of O.A.M.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-06· cited 1×
• Kaplan v. Kaplan
  M.D. Florida· 2012-10-30· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hanson v. Hanson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-30· cited 17×
• In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge: Clayton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-03-19· cited 15×
• Inquiry Concerning Miller
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 8×
• Hatin v. Mitjans
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-12· cited 5×
• Powell v. Chancy-Stoutamire, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-21· cited 3×