Wilson-Thomas v. Small Business Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• findings of fact in patent cases are tested on appeal under the “clearly erroneous” standard of review
• “because patent cases so frequently involve conflicts in the evidence, especially in expert testimony, they seem particularly suited for the review limitations imposed by Rule 52(a)”
• no need to consider synergism were patent invalid for novelty and obviousness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).