Skip to main content
· 3/26/1980

Wilmington Trust Co. v. Conner

Citations

  • 415 A.2d 773
  • 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 900
  • 1980 Del. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether the statutory remedy should “be construed as the exclusive remedy” and therefore whether to follow the setoff approach
  • construing the analogous provisions of the Delaware code under Article 9
  • award of the UCC § 9-507(1) minimum must be based on proof that the particular automobile repossessed was a consumer good; since this factor cannot be presumed and no evidence on the issue was received, the court reversed and remanded for further proceedings
  • “Appeals from the Court of Common Pleas to the Superior Court are to be determined from the record below and are not to be tried de novo. It is also the general rule in this State that issues not raised in the trial court shall not be heard on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, Herrmann, McNEILLY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.