Skip to main content
· 6/21/2001

Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 51 S.W.3d 293
  • 44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 978
  • 2001 Tex. LEXIS 60
  • 2001 WL 690441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to trial court’s jurisdiction in case involving disputed facts
  • stating that exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to trial court's jurisdiction in case involving disputed facts
  • holding school district could not waive jurisdictional challenge to retaliatory discharge suit despite plaintiff’s claim that school district attorney misled her by not informing her of mandatory administrative process
  • noting that jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel or action of party or agency and that school district’s failure to inform employee about administrative remedies did not absolve employee of exhaustion-of-remedies requirement
  • reversing court of appeals = holding that a pleading claiming exhaustion of administrative remedies was conclusive, despite unchallenged evidence to the contrary, absent opponent = s allegation that the pleading was fraudulently made to confer jurisdiction
  • plaintiff acknowledges that exhaustion of remedies is prerequisite to trial court’s jurisdiction “in a case like this involving disputed fact issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.