· 12/2/1992
Wilma Becky Cash v. Jefferson Associates, Inc.
Citations
- 978 F.2d 217
- 978 F.3d 217
- 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 405
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31571
- 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,923
- 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 645
- 1992 WL 331491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that new allegation asserted in response to dismissal motion should have been treated as a motion to amend
- deciding that a response to a motion to dismiss in which plaintiff first alleged that she had been willfully discriminated against should be treated as a motion to amend
- “When a pro se plaintiff raises a new claim for the first time in response to a motion to dismiss, the district court should construe the new claim as a motion to amend the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Garwood, Rosenthal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.