· 3/10/1934
Willt v. Feikert
Citations
- 139 Kan. 22
- 29 P.2d 1078
- 1934 Kan. LEXIS 232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that when determining the intent of the parties, this Court looks to the contract language alone
- noting the general rule that fraud in the inducement renders a contract voidable, but not void
- fraud in the inducement does not render a contract void, but merely voidable at the election of the defrauded party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thiele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.