Skip to main content
· 3/10/1934

Willt v. Feikert

Citations

  • 139 Kan. 22
  • 29 P.2d 1078
  • 1934 Kan. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when determining the intent of the parties, this Court looks to the contract language alone
  • noting the general rule that fraud in the inducement renders a contract voidable, but not void
  • fraud in the inducement does not render a contract void, but merely voidable at the election of the defrauded party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thiele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.