Willson v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court “has broad discretion to fashion remedies which will protect and effectuate its earlier rulings”
• stating that the U&A of the Tulalip Tribes includes Admiralty Inlet
• determining the primary right claims of the Makah and Lower Elwha Klallam Tribes, and stating that if disputes concerning their joint fishery should be referred to the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, whose decision “may be reviewed by the court”
• “In determining usual and accustomed fishing places the court cannot follow stringent proof standards because to do so would likely preclude a finding of any such fishing areas.”
• Tulalip successor in interest to Snoqualmie, Snohomish and Skykomish
• Tulalip successor in interest to Snoqualmie, Snohomish and Skykomish

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).