Skip to main content
· 10/30/1990

Wills Eye Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 582 A.2d 39
  • 135 Pa. Commw. 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the presumption in favor of coverage under the Act applied where an employee struck the claimant with an iron pipe on the employer’s premises and the employee’s motivation for doing so was “unclear”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Palladino, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.