Skip to main content
· 9/15/1960

Willner v. Dade County

Citations

  • 123 So. 2d 494
  • 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 3498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the catch-all provision required proof of common law fraud
  • “In order to establish a violation of [the UTPCPL’s] catch[-]all provision, a plaintiff must prove all of the elements of common-law fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.