Willman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “starkly absolute fee-shifting provision that does not impose a reasonableness requirement on the amount of attorney fees and costs awarded contravenes public policy”
• holding that a “starkly absolute fee-shifting provision that does not impose a reasonableness requirement on the amount of attorney fees and costs awarded contravenes public policy”
• rejecting the appellant’s argument that it was 11 contractually entitled to an award of “all attorney fees and costs, without regard to whether they were reasonable”
• Appellate courts “will not consider a bald legal proposition presented without argument or development.”
• Appellate courts “will not consider a bald legal proposition presented without argument or development.”
• Appellate courts “will not consider a bald legal proposition presented without argument or development.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).