Willis White v. Samuel A. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading Rule 4 to convey “the intention that the judge be given ‘flexibility’ in dealing with habeas petitions”
• “Because this testimony was not used for the truth of the matter asserted by the out-of-court declarant, it was not hearsay, and Bruton is inapposite.”
• “Because this testimony was not used for the truth of the matter asserted by the out-of-court declarant, it was not hearsay, and Bruton is inapposite.”
• “Because this testimony was not used for the truth of the matter asserted by the out-of-court declarant, it was not hearsay, and Bruton is inapposite.”
• “Dismissal of a federal habeas petition for failure to exhaust is appropriate only if the prisoner ha[s] a currently available state remedy at the time of the federal petition’’
• “Dismissal of a federal habeas petition for failure to exhaust is appropriate only if the prisoner ha[s] a currently available state remedy at the time of the federal petition’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).