District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/19/2014
Willis v. State
Citations
- 148 So. 3d 480
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657
- 2014 WL 4656484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We are not inclined to believe that the rule announced in Pardo should be used in the Fourth Amendment context to determine whether evidence from a warrantless search is admissible.”
- “We are not inclined to believe that the rule announced in Pardo should be used in the Fourth Amendment context to determine whether evidence from a warrantless search is admissible.”
- “We are not inclined to believe that the rule announced in Pardo should be used in the Fourth Amendment context to determine whether evidence from a warrantless search is admissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd, Casanueva, Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Christopher L. Carpenter v. State of Florida – Revised OpinionSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-11-02· cited 9×
- State of Florida v. Christopher L. CarpenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-04· cited 5×
- Hanifan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-18· cited 5×
- Robert Burton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-20· cited 1×
- Stabler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-11
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 885×
- Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of BurlingtonSupreme Court· 2012-04-02· cited 697×
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-26· cited 289×
- United States v. FinleyFifth Circuit· 2007-01-26· cited 162×
- United States v. SparksFirst Circuit· 2013-03-26· cited 68×
- Smallwood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-05-02· cited 46×
- Conahan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-03-21· cited 33×
- State v. O'SteenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-08-13· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.