Willis v. Linn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Wjhere a question is considered fundamentally ambiguous, the answers associated with' the. questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction.” (quotations omitted)
• “[W]here there is an argument that the question is ambiguous, but it is not fundamentally ambiguous, a jury must resolve that issue as to the defendant’s understanding of the question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).