· 12/28/2001
Willis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Citations
- 274 F.3d 531
- 348 U.S. App. D.C. 248
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the local rule [83.11] differs only slightly from the Poindexter factors”
- affirming application of the factors set forth in the former LCvR 83.11(a)(4)(B) to decide a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil action brought under the Freedom of Information Act
- affirming application of the factors set forth in the former LCvR 83.11(a)(4)(B) to decide a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil action brought under the Freedom of Information Act
- noting with approval that “[tjhe magistrate also based his denial on. his determination that [the plaintiffs] FOIA case did not involve complex legal or factual issues and, like many FOIA cases, would not require any discovery.”
- “[C]ounsel need not be appointed because [Plaintiff] had shown through numerous, coherent filings that he was capable of representing himself ....”
- “[Gjiven the magistrate’s conclusion that [Plaintiff] was capable of handling his relar tively straightforward FOIA case unaided, the magistrate did not' need to go any further”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Randolph, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.