Skip to main content
· 12/28/2001

Willis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Citations

  • 274 F.3d 531
  • 348 U.S. App. D.C. 248
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the local rule [83.11] differs only slightly from the Poindexter factors”
  • affirming application of the factors set forth in the former LCvR 83.11(a)(4)(B) to decide a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil action brought under the Freedom of Information Act
  • affirming application of the factors set forth in the former LCvR 83.11(a)(4)(B) to decide a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil action brought under the Freedom of Information Act
  • noting with approval that “[tjhe magistrate also based his denial on. his determination that [the plaintiffs] FOIA case did not involve complex legal or factual issues and, like many FOIA cases, would not require any discovery.”
  • “[C]ounsel need not be appointed because [Plaintiff] had shown through numerous, coherent filings that he was capable of representing himself ....”
  • “[Gjiven the magistrate’s conclusion that [Plaintiff] was capable of handling his relar tively straightforward FOIA case unaided, the magistrate did not' need to go any further”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Randolph, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.