Skip to main content
· 7/18/1983

Willis Ray Triplett v. Leflore County, Oklahoma

Citations

  • 712 F.2d 444
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1257
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing district court’s implicit denial of motion to amend raised in post-dismissal motion seeking reconsideration
  • applying Foman in the context of a request to amend contained within a motion to reconsider a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal
  • listing “undue delay” as a reason to deny leave to amend
  • “In dismissing a complaint for failure to state a claim, the court should grant leave to amend freely if it appears at all possible that the plaintiff can correct the defect.”
  • “In dismissing a complaint for failure to state a claim, the court should grant leave to amend freely if it appears at all possible that the plaintiff can correct the defect.” (quotation omitted)
  • “In dismissing a complaint for failure to state a claim, the court should grant leave to amend freely if it appears at all possible that the plaintiff can correct the defect.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitenstein, Holloway, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.