· 8/30/2005
Willingham v. Gonzales
Citations
- 391 F. Supp. 2d 52
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18882
- 2005 WL 2364954
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a six-month lapse between the retaliatory action and the protected activity is insufficient to support a finding of causation on the basis of temporal proximity
- concluding that a six-month lapse between the retaliatory action and the protected activity is insufficient to support a finding of causation on the basis of temporal proximity
- finding that a three-month period was sufficient but a six-month period was too long
- finding that three-month period was sufficient but a six-month period was too long
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.