Skip to main content
· 8/30/2005

Willingham v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 391 F. Supp. 2d 52
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18882
  • 2005 WL 2364954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a six-month lapse between the retaliatory action and the protected activity is insufficient to support a finding of causation on the basis of temporal proximity
  • concluding that a six-month lapse between the retaliatory action and the protected activity is insufficient to support a finding of causation on the basis of temporal proximity
  • finding that a three-month period was sufficient but a six-month period was too long
  • finding that three-month period was sufficient but a six-month period was too long

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.