Willingham v. Crooke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that whether someone “was entitled to qualified immunity under” settled facts is a legal question
• stating that “a genuine question of material fact regarding ‘[w]hether the conduct allegedly violative of the right actually occurred . . . must be reserved for trial.’”
• holding disputes over “historical facts . . . must be reserved for trial”
• “Ordinarily, the question of qualified immunity should be decided at the summary judgment stage.”
• “Ordinarily, the question of qualified immunity should be decided at the summary judgment stage.”
• “Ordinarily, the question of qualified immunity should be decided at the summary judgment stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).