Skip to main content
· 4/16/1835

Willing v. Perot

Citations

  • 5 Rawle 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting state constitutional provision prohibiting an initiative that “makes a specific appropriation of money from the treasury”
  • where money has been specifically appropriated Legislature is “powerless to appropriate any revenue from that source to any other public use”
  • “No money can be paid out of the treasury except under the provisions of the budget which require both executive and legislative sanction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.