Willig v. State, Department of Health & Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing agency record created before the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare independently of district court’s appellate decision
• “Because we affirm the ... decision that Willig did not prove the necessary elements of equitable and quasi estoppel, we do not address the further question whether estoppel may ever be applied against [the government].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).