Willie Trottie v. Brad Livingston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that uncertainty regarding the effect of an execution drug was not a “cognizable liberty interest” and, thus, did not trigger “a due process right to disclosure”
• “[W]e have held that an uncertainty as to the method of execution is not a cognizable liberty interest.” (citing Sepulvado v. Jindal, 729 F.3d 413, 420 (5th Cir. 2013))
• “A due process right to disclosure requires an inmate to show a cognizable liberty interest in obtaining information about execution protocols . . . . However, we have held that an uncertainty as to the method of execution is not a cognizable liberty interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).