WILLIE SLADE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that justification for no-contact-with-minors provision was not obvious from the record where there were no allegations of inappropriate contact with minors
• holding that the district court plainly erred in imposing, without explanation, a prohibition on contact with minors because the offense conduct did not entail inappropriate contact with minors
• explaining that where a defendant used a peer-to-peer filing-sharing software, “regardless of [his] intent, his conduct was indisputably ‘related to’ the transfer and distribution of child pornography”
• “The weight to be afforded any sentencing factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review, as long as the sentence ultimately imposed is reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).