Willie O. PENDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the hypothetical question to the VE failed to assume the existence of psychological problems, which the ALJ found to be severe, the decision was not based on substantial evidence
• holding that since the hypothetical question upon which the expert based his testimony failed to assume the existence of psychological problems, which the ALJ found to be severe, the decision was not based on substantial evidence
• holding that since the hypothetical question upon which the expert base his testimony failed to assume the existence of psychological problems, which the ALJ found to be severe, the decision was not based on substantial evidence
• holding that since the hypothetical question upon which the expert based his testimony failed to assume the existence of psychological problems, which the ALJ found to be severe, the decision was not based on substantial evidence
• holding that since the hypothetical question upon which the expert based his testimony failed to assume the existence of psychological problems, which the ALJ found to be severe, the decision was not based on substantial evidence
• “Because the ‘misuse of the expert’s testimony alone warrants reversal,’ we do not consider the appellant’s other claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).