Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “connection” element was satisfied where the plaintiff “aggravated his pre-existing lumbar illness”
• holding that the “connection” element was satisfied where the plaintiff “aggravated his pre-existing lumbar illness”
• holding that because plaintiff 12 R. Doc. 17-11 at 24-25 (“Provost Deposition”
• holding that because plaintiff “‘knew that the information on the application was not correct,’ [he] intentionally concealed his prior injuries as a matter of law” (quoting Caulfield v. Kathryn Rae Towing, No. 88-5329, 1989 WL 121586, at (E.D. La. June 6, 1989)
• vacating a punitive damages award after finding an employer established all three elements of a McCorpen defense
• noting in review of a district court’s findings following a bench trial that “[w]here findings are infirm because of an erroneous view of the law, a remand is the proper course unless the record permits only one resolution of the factual issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).