Willie James Jeffries, Jr. v. Crispus C. Nix, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding victim’s history of prostitution irrelevant to defendant’s theory that the victim received drugs and alcohol without striking a bargain and later desired to “reimburse” the defendant with sexual favors
• holding victim's history of prostitution irrelevant to defendant's theory that the victim received drugs and alcohol without striking a bargain and later desired to \reimburse\ the defendant with sexual favors
• finding the victim’s history of exchanging sex for money irrelevant to the defendant’s theory that the victim consented to sex as compensation for drugs and alcohol
• finding the victim's history of exchanging sex for money irrelevant to the defendant's theory that the victim consented to sex as compensation for drugs and alcohol
• finding a victim’s history of exchanging sex for money irrelevant to the defendant’s theory that the victim intended to use sex to reimburse him for drugs and alcohol
• essentially finding a victim's sexual history irrelevant in the absence of compelling evidence of modus operandi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).