Willie E. BOAZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMICS LABORATORY, INC., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's initial failure to respond to a motion to dismiss and subsequent failure to respond after an express order to do so within ten days were insufficient grounds for dismissal
• holding that plaintiff’s initial failure to respond to a motion to dismiss and subsequent failure to respond after an express order to do so within ten days were insufficient grounds for dismissal
• holding that plaintiff’s initial failure to respond to a motion to dismiss and subsequent failure to respond after an express order to do so within ten days were insufficient grounds for dismissal
• providing that a district court’s dis- missal without prejudice is generally subject to “a less stringent standard of review . . . because the plaintiff would be able to file his suit again.”
• “Where, however, the statute of limitations prevents or arguably may prevent a party from refiling his case after it has been dismissed, we fail to see how a dismissal without prejudice is any less severe a sanction than a dismissal with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).