Willie B. Hadley, Jr. v. Michael L. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement
• holding that the rule applies for purposes of habeas corpus under Section 2254
• explaining that a prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement
• observing there is no liberty interest, and thus no due process protection, with regard to discretionary good time credits that have yet to be awarded
• prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement
• prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).