Skip to main content
· 2/14/1989

Willie B. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 921
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2697
  • 1989 WL 18368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating remand is appropriate only where the new evidence is “material to the claimant’s condition during the relevant time period encompassed by the disability application under review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.