Williamson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the owner of a chicken house with an automatic chicken feeding system could not be held liable for injury to an employee's child because the employee’s failure to protect her child was the proximate cause of the injury
• finding that it was unforeseeable to defendant that a young child’s father would not properly protect the child from a known danger
• held unforeseeable that employee who brought his minor child with him to his place of employment upon the defendant's premises would fail to protect the child from an injury caused by a dangerous condition well known to the employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).