Skip to main content
· 2/28/2002

Williamson v. State Farms Lloyds

Citations

  • 76 S.W.3d 64
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 1532
  • 2002 WL 287748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when there is a conflict of interest as to whether the insured's acts were covered by the policy, there is no privity between insured and insurer at trial, and thus the insurer is not collaterally estopped from relitigating the existence of false imprisonment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles W. Seymore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.