Skip to main content
· 5/20/2003

Williamson v. Prasciunas

Citations

  • 661 N.W.2d 645
  • 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 622
  • 2003 WL 21151245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in order to prove fraudulent concealment, appellant must demonstrate that statements were intentionally false
  • explaining that a statute of limitations is tolled if the defendant fraudulently concealed a cause of action
  • “A mere argument . . . does not meet the requirements of Rule 56.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minge, Kalitowski, Poritsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.